Holistic Evaluation Rubric
Persistence & Commitment
| Attribute | Strong evidence | Some evidence | Not evident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Support Person Availability | Can define a professional support network including mentors | Expresses support from one individual, or family, or community | Expresses little or no support from family or institution for goals |
| Leadership / Community Involvement | Demonstrates involvement and leadership ability in either academics, family, community, religious group, or athletics | Demonstrates involvement in groups in academia or extramural but has not shown leadership | Not involved in institutional or community group, no demonstrated leadership |
| Non-traditional Learning / Initiative | Has engaged in, and learned from, experiences outside the classroom, i.e., performed independent research, extramural activities, self-taught skills | Shows some evidence of non-traditional learning experience | Has not engaged in or indicated learning from experiences outside the classroom |
| Perseverance | Can describe a time they failed or encountered an obstacle and successfully coped | Can identify a time they hit an obstacle but has trouble defining how they overcame the challenge | Has little experience with failure/obstacles. Cannot provide an example or describe response |
Individuality
| Attribute | Strong evidence | Some evidence | Not evident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive Self-Concept | Expresses confidence they can complete challenging goals, makes positive statements about abilities | Shows confidence and independence but may be unsure about adequacy or skills | Is unsure they can complete the program, exhibits low self-esteem |
| Realistic Self-Appraisal | Can clearly and realistically delineate strengths and weaknesses, works on self-development | Has trouble identifying strengths and weaknesses but appreciates/seeks both positive and negative feedback | Over or understates abilities, does little to no self-assessment, does not appear to have learned from experiences |
| Personal and professional ethics | Can very clearly describe ethics within self and within a professional setting; also letter writers describe clear demonstration of integrity | Describes some ethics within self or professionally; alternatively, letter writers describe clear demonstration of integrity | Has very little to no ethics professionally or within self |
Research Potential
| Attribute | Strong evidence | Some evidence | Not evident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference for long vs. short term goals | Clearly communicates long-range goals beyond graduate school | Primary goal is graduate degree | Is vague about long-term goals or goals are short term such as coursework or a specific project |
| Alignment of goals | Stated goals are well aligned with the strengths and mission of the Biology Department and potential advisor | Stated goals are aligned with the goals of the potential advisor, but are somewhat outside the strengths and mission of the Biology Department | Stated goals are not well aligned with those of the potential advisor or the Biology Department |
| Research Experience | Has led in independent research | Has participated in directed research | No relevant research experience |
| Scientific communications - Publications | Has submitted a first-author publication | Has coauthored a publication | Has not participated in the publication process |
| Scientific communication - Presentations | Has presented research to a scientific audience in the form of an oral presentation | Has presented research to a scientific audience in the form of a poster presentation | Has not presented research to a scientific audience |
| Teaching & mentoring skills | Has experience teaching and mentoring with clear demonstration of positive outcomes | Has experience teaching or mentoring, perhaps some demonstration of positive outcomes | No experience teaching or mentoring or no indication of positive outcomes |
| Innovation & creativity | Several examples of problem solving in research | Some indication that applicant may be good at problem solving | No indication that applicant is good at problem solving in research |
| Planning & organization | Indication of ability to track research projects, data, and results | Has experience organizing either data or multiple projects with success | No indication of ability to track research projects, data, or results in an organized manner |
| Teamwork | Clear demonstration of ability to effectively function as a member of a research team in both leadership and supporting roles | Some indication of ability to effectively function as a member of a research team in either leadership or supporting roles | No indication of ability to effective function as a member of a team |
Academic Performance
| Attribute | Strong evidence | Some evidence | Not evident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coursework | Has succeeded in a broad range of coursework that will provide a solid foundation for graduate work in Biology and has achieved high grades in the relevant classes | Some key courses are missing or grades are low in some areas, but an upward trajectory in performance is notable | Many key courses missing or grades consistently low |
| Recognition | Consistent record of scholastic achievement in the form of Dean List, Honors, Awards, or Scholarship throughout college. May also be noted in LoR (e.g., top 1% of class) | Some recognition of scholastic achievement noted toward the end of college education demonstrates an upward trajectory. | Scholastic achievement has not been formally recognized |
| Writing Skills | Statement of purpose is well written and conveys clear message | Statement of purpose conveys message, but the quality or organization of the writing could be improved | The message conveyed by the statement of purpose is not clear and the writing is of poor quality |